Specification · Entry
Institutional Assessment of Procedures
How external contributions arrive, circulate and are documented.
The problem
Without an assessment, a transparency project risks buying technology before understanding the workflow it is meant to serve.
Summary
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Intended for | Institutions that want to improve institutional quality and the documentation of decision-making |
| Investment | On request Limited scope, with a defined deliverable |
| Duration | Three to five weeks |
| Reference basis | Our own methodology, with local validation |
| Tier and code | Entry · [código PMV a atribuir] |
Deliverables
- assessment report;
- gap matrix;
- phased recommendations, with and without regulatory change.
Method
- document review of the local framework;
- interviews with departments;
- validation of findings with the institution.
What is not included
- an opinion on compliance with local law, which requires a lawyer from the country.
Responsibility for validating and publishing the information always remains with the client body.
Next step
After this service, the natural next step is Pilot Project on Documenting Contributions.
Request a proposal for this serviceAll services
Clients with a service in progress: access the Office.
Normative update of this page: . References confirmed against official sources on that date; anything unconfirmed is shown in square brackets and italics.